![]() ![]() So for a third and fourth reason your premise that this could somehow disprove the virgin birth is groundless. These materials do not last for 2000 years except in extremely rare circumstances. There is virtually zero chance (I am tempted to say that there is zero chance, but…) that they have found actual blood cells with recognizable AB blood type or with recognizable XY chromosomes. (The reason I say I am skeptical is that the Shroud has been tested twice and the results have been published in reliable journals, putting the age at about 750 years, not 2000) If that were true, then there is virtually a zero chance that they have found DNA or chromosomes on this cloth. ![]() Let me assume that the cloth in the cathedral in Turin is 2000 years old, plus or minus three hundred years. However, for the sake of argument, let me assume something that I believe is almost certainly not true. I believe that the source you are using is unreliable. If this were true, then I almost certainly would have heard about it. Is there any solution to the virgin birth in light of modern science? Thanks.įirst of all, I an EXTREMELY skeptical of the claim that new evidence proves the Shroud of Turin to be in the range of 300 BC and AD 300. Where did the Y chromosome come from? If God is an immaterial being, how could he have randomly created the Y chromosomes and additional 23 chromosomes to constitute the 46 chromosomes needed for an embryo out of nothing? If all things that begin to exist require a cause, surely these 23 chromosome needed to make up all 46 chromosomes require a biological origin. As a result the blood found on the Shroud was type AB, and had both X and Y chromosomes. Do DNA tests prove Jesus had two human parents? Recently the Shroud of Turin has been re-dated within the range of 300 BC to 300 AD. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |